
Last night, over dinner at
Musso & Frank Grill in Hollywood, this correspondent confirmed that without a doubt,
the new Apple iPod Nano is neither a chocolate bar nor a pat of butter.
I received a review unit from Apple earlier in the day, and brought it along to test it out the best way I knew how: in the hands of friends.
Our waiter said he was astonished at how thin and lightweight it was (6.5 mm!), and he stared at an episode of Flight of the Conchords for so long that other tables began complaining. "The video quality is really amazing," he said, and I agree. The device is small, but that 204 pixel per inch display renders 320x240 res with about 65% more brightness than previous generation iPods.
One female friend at the table, who'd had a few too many of those Musso Martinis, offered to taste-test the hypothesis that the Nano is made of chocolate -- we grabbed the device back just in time.
It is in fact made of anodized aluminum and shiny polished steel, but the translucent color finish (in this case, red) does give it an appealing, candy-like feel.
The UI is a few steps more intuitive than the last nano generation, but I found myself (as did other friends at the table) thumbing at the screen, now acclamated to iPhones. It's not a touchscreen, and it's hard to kill that instinct now.
Coverflow is nice on this tiny device. One male pal at the table flipped through photos for a long time, and liked how bright and crisp they looked, even on the compact display.

I like that I can use my fancy schmanzty Bose headphones with this Nano, unlike the iPhone, which is designed to accept only Apple-issued headphones (or others designed for that non-standard jack depth, and the potential RF interference).
I spoke to an Apple rep yesterday about those pre-launch leaked images of the Nano popping up on various gadget blogs before Wednesday. Apple asked those sites to remove the images, in part because people "wouldn't see the context," as this spokesperson said -- I can see why. Those photos made the new Nano's butt look big. In the photos, the new Nano looks a lot bulkier and wider than earlier generation Nanos, but when you're holding the little bugger in your own hands it feels pleasingly petite.
4GB models are $149, 8GB are $199 (that's the edition where you can choose colors: red, silver, black, blue, green).
Of the three devices launched this week by Apple -- the "Touch," the new Nano, and the "Classic" -- if I were going to go buy one it'd probably be the Classic. 160 gazigamajigabytes! I'd use it on foreign trips to back up sound (if I'm doing field recordings and interviews for NPR), and photos or video. Holds about 200 hours of video, less if it's HD but still -- a bunch of space in what would amount to a very small portable hard drive.
Oh, bonus round: I also asked the Apple folks if they planned on releasing an SDK for iPhone any time soon, given that so many developers were working so feverishly on installable apps. No plans to do so at this time, quoth the spokesperson. They're encouraging people to develop and use Web 2.0 apps instead.
Photos: top, shot at Musso & Frank Grill on Hollywood Boulevard with an iPhone, below on my desk with the same.