Sweet Spot: Where I Get to Go Eat Free Candy

Press events are usually a waste of time. I avoid them if I can. But while I'm typically lured out by free booze, the geniuses behind the "Sweet Spot" event went double-fisted: booze and chocolate. A group of confectioners gather every year to show off their latest goods to the press, inviting us in to stuff gooey sweets into our cavernous chonk-holes; to dribble wine down our shirts as we "notice the pairing of the cacao nibs with the sharpness of the wine," even though our mouths are still coated in the amniotic slime from a just-hatched marshmallow Peep; to discover how many ways companies can rebrand the flavor "mint"; to hear how healthful chocolate is—the darker the healthier. Then they sent us home with like 20 pounds of candy. Normally I don't even take home the brochures from press events, but you can bet your ass I sweated that paper sack full of *trose treasures through a crowded subways and cold Brooklyn streets. And then went on a four day fast in penance. * Unsurprisingly, the coolest candies were the ones being marketed to children. My cohort Kat and I, when not making our PR handler nervous from all our tittering and misfired jokes**, were completely enamored by the Mike & Ike's Spray, a sweet-and-sour solution of the familiar candy in a handy mister, perfect for hungry asthmatics. It's very addictive, not unlike Binaca and other flavor sprays. Shssmppfft. Slap tongue against roof of mouth. Repeat until container or pancreas is empty.
We also got a kick out of the Bubble Roll Message Maker, which works just like the squeeze tape labelers of old, but impresses letters onto a six-foot roll of sour gum. Take solace in knowing that I did attempt to imprint something puerile into my piece of gum before giving up and chewing a nice strip of "COCJJJJ." Replacement gum is available, so you don't have to buy a whole new gun. They also have another Message Maker that does emoticons, but it's not as fun, which is to say it's not as easy to write distasteful phrases. (You can buy a Message Maker online for $3.) While we ate tons of decent chocolate (my personal poison), I also had to knock back a few "Sports Beans" from Jelly Belly to keep up my stamina. Each bean is filled with vitamins, electrolytes, and carbohydrates—and some have caffeine. They're not candy, sir! They're a performance-enhancing Extreme bean. We tried desperately to get the woman showing these off to acknowledge that these beans, like most energy drinks, mostly are just full of delicious, buzz-inducing sugar. She was firm. There is also a new version of the Nestle Crunch bar coming out, called "Crunch: Crisp!" I begged the PR woman to explain to me the difference between crunch and crisp, but that got her flustered, so she just kept repeating "Crisp is crispy; crunch is crunchy." Things might have gone worse for her but Kat noticed a framed photograph of Stevie Nix in the fake bookcases in the fake living room of the demo area which sent our sugar-fired attention steaming stickily away from the crunch/crisp dilemma. Finally, as something of a Peeps connoisseur, I must tell you two things: sugar-free Peeps made from Splenda are surprisingly close to the genuine article, although very expensive at $1 for three (they may also not "cure" like proper Peeps will do, but I did not have time to test); Peppermint Peeps are actually sort of gross. * I actually don't eat that much candy these days, so I'm going to swipe a couple of chocolate bars out of the bag and give the rest away at Funde Razor. ** "The snap from the chocolate is how you can tell it is well-tempered," said one nice woman from Nestle. I held the chocolate to my ear. "This one sounds like a dick." She coughed. "But it's...square?"
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Sweet Spot: Where I Get to Go Eat Free Candy

  1. semiotix says:

    Crispy things are compressible and striated. Air or some other interstitial medium is essential for crispiness.

    Crunchy things are solid and may cleave in any number of planes. In a rigid food, crunchiness is the absence of crispiness.

    These elements give rise to the epiphenomena other food-ontologists have already noted (higher pitch from the sound of something crispy being chewed, as a function of its lower mass per unit volume; greater resistance in crunchy foods, as a consequence of the covalent bonds that characterize them, versus the van der Waals forces at work between layers of crisped foods).

  2. cayton says:

    “But it’s…square?”

    That made my day (but almost got me in trouble in class).

  3. grouchosuave says:

    You have Peeps!

    and then a “framed photograph of Stevie Nix in the fake bookcases in the fake living room of the demo area”
    if that ain’t a TOTAL BONUS!!!

    what no giant leap forward in ‘Circus Peanut’ technology?


  4. Anonymous says:

    I suppose you know that sweets aren’t that healthy for your body, especially if you eat them in such a big quantity like you are saying above. So, you might want to reconsider the idea of consuming so many sweets because you might regret later.

  5. hassan-i-sabbah says:

    semiotix -wow. do you, by any chance, work for Heston Blumenthal?

  6. RyanH says:

    I actually have a lot of sympathy for the PR people who work that kind of show. Think about it. In that kind of environment, you are either indulging, or not. There would not be a lot of in-between.
    So, everybody is either on the mother of all sugar highs, or else is the type of person who does not eat candy. At all.

  7. Bonnie says:

    If only candy corn could be remastered to actually taste good, I would finally believe in the power of science.

  8. ike says:

    I would assert that crunchy stuff makes a lower sound when you chew it and crispy stuff makes a higher sound when you chew it. For example, Cinnamon Toast Crunch vs. Cocoa Crispies. You just can’t cruch crispies, and the cinnamon toast-esque rectangles are too large and thick to be exactly ‘crisp’.

    …and then there’s the topic of Butterfinger bars and superpositions of crisp/crunch states, but I digress…

  9. drewstarr says:

    Chiming in with my own theory on crispy vs. crunchy.
    I believe they describe similar sensations — tangible resistance to the teeth, with a sudden, even noisy give once the teeth win. The key difference in usage has to do with whether one is biting or chewing.
    Crispness, to me, refers to the feel of the initial bite of a food. Crunchiness, however, I feel refers to the texture of the food as you chew it.
    Do we need these two different words? Yes, I think we do. Brownies loaded chock full of nuts could be crunchy, but they’re definitely not crispy. I’m failing at coming up with a satisfying example from the crispy but not crunchy from the natural world (tomatoes / plums come close though), but I could easily see a candy company or Ferran Adria-type create some goo filled confection with a crisp exterior.

  10. d34dfish says:

    The Crunch: Crisp is shaped more like a regurlar candy bar, not as flat & wide as the normal Crunch. It has multiple waffer like layers.
    They’ve had it in our vending machines for awhile now and it’s pretty damn good. Want me to send you one?

  11. Bazilisk says:

    As an official “member of the press,” I am SO GOING THERE NEXT YEAR. YES.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


More BB

Boing Boing Video

Flickr Pool




Displays ads via FM Tech

RSS and Email

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution. Boing Boing is a trademark of Happy Mutants LLC in the United States and other countries.

FM Tech