Brand Study Implies Secret Mechanism of Sigil Magic(k)

applemichael.jpg

A 30 millisecond, nearly subliminal flash of a logo can affect behavior, says a study from Duke University and University of Waterloo researchers. Flashing Apple’s logo caused test subjects to describe about 30 percent more uses for a brick, while the IBM logo prompted less but more similar answers from subject to subject.

This will be spun into an Apple story—Epicenter already did, for instance—but it’s a fairly monumental acknowledgement of the power of logoforms if further study continues to bear out the same results. It follows to ask: how does a logo gain its meaning? And how can we uses logos of our own design to prompt our own willful, subconscious results?

I’m reminded of the work of Austen Osman Spare, a 19th-20th century painter whose personal philosophy included the notion of “sigil magic.” While Spare did not cotton to the ornate ritual of his hermetic peers such as the Golden Dawn or O.T.O., he practiced a simple ritual in which a statement of intent could be codified into a glyph. This sigil would then be “activated,” through intense effort Pete Carroll referred to as “Slight of Mind,” such as yogic concentration or deliberate forgetfulness. Spare used a form a sex magic, in which sustained self-pleasure was used to create a state of absent-mindedness in which the sigil could slip into the subconscious.

Is it possible, then, that this logo study has borne out some theory to explain the mental workings of sigil magic? And that we’ve impregnated our subconscious with thousands of warring logos bursting with beneficent or malicious meaning?

I’m just glad that I am usually not staring at the back of my Macbook every time I masturbate.

[Left, an Apple logo; right, Agrippa's sigil for the Archangel Michael. For the record, I tend to believe that "magic" as a ritual to affect subconcious thought sounds quite possible, but am exceedingly skeptical about it affecting the physical world in any measurable way.]

This entry was posted in apple, Consumption, thought and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Brand Study Implies Secret Mechanism of Sigil Magic(k)

  1. Anonymous says:

    It’s fascinating that more people are making this connection. I was thinking along similar lines when this story broke. Brands and logos compete for mind share and enchant us with their subtle and not-so-subtle promises. They’re crafted with precision to slip past our defenses and hook into the reptilian depths of our brain.

    Btw, speaking of sigils, the reCAPTCHA human checker you use to gate posts is barely legible.

  2. Anonymous says:

    While it may be true that “Apple has worked for many years to develop a brand character associated with nonconformity, innovation and creativity,” and that “IBM is viewed by consumers as traditional, smart and responsible”, is that really the brand perception of the 341 college students who acted as subjects for this study? What does IBM mean to a typical 20-year old today?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

More BB

Boing Boing Video

Flickr Pool

Digg

Wikipedia

Advertise

Displays ads via FM Tech

RSS and Email

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution. Boing Boing is a trademark of Happy Mutants LLC in the United States and other countries.

FM Tech