Representative wants free, porn-less Internet for all

Disappointed with the predictability of the victors in the recent spectrum auction, which saw AT&T and Verizon walking away with 70% of the up-for-grabs airwaves, Representative Anna G. Eshoo (Gesundheit! Wokka wokka!) wants the FCC to auction off the 2155-2175Mhz band. The catch?

The winner would have to use the spectrum to create a nationwide wireless Internet service that is available to the public at no cost, automatically blocks access to pornographic content, and is fully open to third-party device manufacturers.

“Automatic blocking of pornographic content?” Pass the magic jaybone, lady. Even eliminating the technical impossibility of automatic porn blocking, if our recent Rule 34 Challenge proved anything, it is that there is nothing under the sun that isn’t porn for someone.

Lawmaker calls for no-cost, porn-free, wireless ‘Net access [Ars Technica]

This entry was posted in verizon and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Representative wants free, porn-less Internet for all

  1. Jake0748 says:

    I, for one, will eschew Ms Eshoo’s idea.

  2. ccreitz says:

    So predictable. Representative Eshoo is bravely leading the charge to the nanny state, and somehow, in the second-richest congressional district in America, the Republican party has been unable to find so much as a challenger.

    Single party state ftw.

  3. claud9999 says:

    Note where Eshoo’s district is: the heart of Silicon Valley and where Google, Microsoft, Verisign, etc. have major offices and/or headquarters. Does she represent the bulk of her constituents in this statement, not at all likely. Is she representing some companies whose business would be providing the technology to do the networking or the filtering? Likely. (Partial disclosure: I work in her district and I have yet to be impressed by her.)

    http://www.house.gov/formeshoo/zipauth.html

  4. shaggy35 says:

    I don’t even see how this would be good for her constituents (or for anyone at all).

    It’s essentially asking companies to spend billions of dollars in an auction for a bandwidth that they’re NOT ALLOWED to make money off of (because it has to be free.)

    Blocking porn makes it even worse – you’re eliminating one of the largest money makers on the internet.

    How does someone like this even get elected? (I always find myself asking that question)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

More BB

Boing Boing Video

Flickr Pool

Digg

Wikipedia

Advertise

Displays ads via FM Tech

RSS and Email

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution. Boing Boing is a trademark of Happy Mutants LLC in the United States and other countries.

FM Tech