Ego’s purse-like fashion laptops

egolifestyle.jpg

The Ego Lifestyle is a luxury laptop designed to simulate the look of a hand bag when closed. It certainly looks swank: the handmade leather skins are easily swapped from alligator to leopard print according to your ensemble, for example. And even the specs are pretty nice: there’s a real machine here. The price, however, is jaw dropping: over $4,000 for the basic model. But let’s face it… when the official website constantly bombards you with glamor shots of millionaire fashionistas carrying their purse-like luxury laptops while Indian bellhops struggle behind them to lug 200 pounds of luggage up to the penthouse suite, you know they’re marketing exclusively to twats.

Ego Lifestyle Notebooks [Official Site]

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Ego’s purse-like fashion laptops

  1. badonkadankeschoen says:

    Do people really want to buy a product called Ego? Isn’t that like buying a sports car called Small Penis?

  2. Anonymous says:

    4000 is cheap considering there are handbags that cost as much without any computing power.
    however, if their target market exist -> rich + cares about fashion + carries a laptop

  3. Bruce Arthurs says:

    Can I say that I find the use of “twats” mildly upsetting, when “twits” would have suited just as well, without the sexual baggage associated with “twat”?

    (“Bruce Arthurs: Pedant or Prude? Cast Your Votes Now!“)

  4. Takuan says:

    agreed, Pedant.

  5. univac says:

    Hey, finally there is a market for the old “toilet seat”/”handbag” Apple G3 iBooks. The resemblance is remarkable!
    I’ll just take a few out of the heap of electronics in my garage, spiff ‘em up with a few crystals and leather, and charge $2000. How’s that for undercutting!
    I’m sure the buyers won’t notice the complete lack of any modern useful hardware…they aren’t using it so much as a laptop as a fashion accessory.

  6. cperry says:

    agreed, Bruce. we don’t need more misogyny, thanks.

  7. cha0tic says:

    I dunno, John Cooper Clarke gives a good definition of the word Twat.

  8. dculberson says:

    It’s funny, the Brits treat twat like a regular swear word, but in the US it’s a much bigger deal, worse than “fuck,” here, I think.

  9. Tenn says:

    It’s funny, the Brits treat twat like a regular swear word, but in the US it’s a much bigger deal, worse than “fuck,” here, I think.

    Used to be worse than fuck, but I think (from personal experience which we all know is about as reliable as the Titanic) I think it’s losing its strength in common parlance. I called someone a twat-toupee once within hearing of an administrator and received only a verbal warning. Fuck gets you a suspension, though.

  10. hassan-i-sabbah says:

    Nothing wrong with the word “twat”,fine anglo-saxon term that it is .People need to be a bit less cuntish about language….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

More BB

Boing Boing Video

Flickr Pool

Digg

Wikipedia

Advertise

Displays ads via FM Tech

RSS and Email

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution. Boing Boing is a trademark of Happy Mutants LLC in the United States and other countries.

FM Tech