Seriously, folks. If you don’t like the whole Infomercia thing, then go get your gadget news somewhere else today (and Friday) and quitchyerbitchin’.
Seriously, folks (@8,9): Do you really think the Boing Boing editors don’t want written feedback on whether their readers appreciate this gimmick?
A slump in their pageviews and visits won’t tell them this: It was cute the first time. Now it’s tiresome.
[#14] Come now. “I fantasize that this resulted in low traffic and advertiser flight” is surely not the most robust argument you could have come up with.
Actually, my fantasies are more interesting than that. But if I were to permanently switch to Gizmodo, as one commenter (#8) recommended, wouldn’t you want to know why? That, however, would be an empty threat. Gizmodo is too gadgety for me. BB Gadgets is just about right–except for when you indulge the Infomercia shtick (which, by the way, would make for a great, separate, parody Web site).
This poster reminds me of Kevin Bacon’s character during the riot scene in Animal House…
oh no, not again.
Take your time.
No really – take as long as you want.
A week, a month, even a decade or two.
To be honest: if it never came back at all, I can’t see many people shedding a tear. I count myself among the dry-eyed.
permanently switch to Gizmodo
“We at the Internet appreciate that you have only one choice; we thank you for choosing us.”
Read two websites?? Preposterous.
Why more of this Infomercia flavoring dumped on top of Gadget Wholesomeness?
Infomercia = BULLSHIT!
“Oh noes! If only there was somewhere – ANYWHERE – that I could find out information on the latest gadgets that I will not buy! Curse those meddling boingboingers!”
The interesting thing is that a lot of the praise is directed at the work, much of the criticism is directed at us.
If nothing else, “shitcock” written from anonymity is powerful encouragement.
#11: “A slump in their pageviews and visits won’t tell them this: It was cute the first time. Now it’s tiresome”
What do you think high traffic accompanied by hundreds of effusively positive and negative comments tells us?
Come now. “I fantasize that this resulted in low traffic and advertiser flight” is surely not the most robust argument you could have come up with.
…Enough of this crap, kids! I say we start flooding certain BB staffers’ Twitter accounts protest tweets until they give this really tasteless joke up.
Am I the only one who actually likes to have my raging consumerism packaged in a unique way? Read Gizmodo if you can’t stand a little strangeness from your gadget blog.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Twitter • Facebook
RSS • Email • TELEGRAM
Log in • Register
Tom the Dancing Bug
Advertise • Policies • Comment Policy
J/K to scroll posts • 100 latest comments
About Boing Boing
Art and Design
Boing Boing Video
Displays ads via FM Tech
RSS and Email
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License
permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
Boing Boing is a trademark of Happy Mutants LLC in the
United States and other countries.