Appended to an otherwise standard write-up of Apple’s recent quarterly earnings call, The New York Times‘ John Markoff dropped this bombshell:
That would seem to confirm findings that a search engine company shared with me on condition that I not reveal its name: The company spotted Web visits from an unannounced Apple product with a display somewhere between an iPhone and a MacBook. Is it the iPhone 3.0 or the NetMac 1.0?
It’s not hard to believe that Apple is at least prototyping a netbook. But combined with Jobs’ statement that the iPhone is Apple’s netbook, it’s more likely to be a higher-def iPhone, following the suit of smartphones like HTC’s Touch HD.
Or, more likely, neither. As Gadget Lab’s Charlie “Steal My Bike, Please” Sorrel points out, a Hackintosh netbook such as an MSI Wind would report itself as OS X 10.5.5 with a screen resolution of 1024×600… definitely “somewhere between” an iPhone and a MacBook’s display.
Read My Lips: Apple is a netbook maker [New York Times via Mac Rumors]
* – A netbook needs to be the form factor of a traditional laptop, but shrunk down to the limits of comfortable usability. The iPhone is no more a netbook than a netbook is a PDA.



I’m curious about the actual resolution. If it is 640×480 or 800×480, I would think it a better iPhone. Otherwise, yeah, probably hackintosh netbooks.
It could just be someone playing with their resolution settings or even running MacOS in a window under VMWare.
I’m going to say I called it with my previous BB comment here:
http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2008/10/22/apple-says-netbooks.html#comment-313195
Look at the home button in the upper right corner; rather small for an iPhone. Also, no ear speaker (or whatever that’s called), a must for a phone. I’m not gonna speculate what it is, but it ain’t a phone.
FYI, hackintoshes generally report themselves as Mac Pros, so its likely not a Wind that’s got everyone excited.
So it’s a tablet with Apple’s bluetooth keyboard?
(That should also give you an approximation of its dimensions.)
Well, wouldn’t said unnamed search engine know the IP addresses, and see who they belong to before bothering to pass the information along?
People, the picture above is for illustration purposes only.
The only relevant info was gathered from server logs.