iPhone Nano probability zero ... but what about a Shuffle?
Wired's Dylan Tweney has the best of this afternoon's "Screw the iPhone Nano" posts.
The "Nano iPhone" that iDealsChina is so excited about is probably a fake. Sorry, Apple fans. It's just not that much smaller than a regular iPhone 3G, and it's hard to imagine Jobs getting excited about something that's just a little smaller (and lacking 3G). Plus, as MacRumors.com points out, iDealsChina is a "questionably reliable" source.
The underlying reasons why there's no Nano seem obvious now that the AppStore is part of the landscape. The hardware specifications of a slightly-smaller iPhone would either break existing apps, change the existing user interface, or make it a pain in the ass. The iPhone Nano people have in mind is a high-dpi eye-gouger with a less precise touchscreen and even worse battery life.
Routing around this is the idea of an iPhone Shuffle, which could be so simple that it doesn't run apps at all, or even have a touchscreen: check out Dennis Crothers' mockup at the source below, the first entry in Wired's competition to design a tiny iPhone.
I imagine something that keeps the touchscreen, but is a smidgin smaller than the Nano-most-imagined: just the keypad, address book and iPod controls, please.
Rumor: Apple Definitely, Probably Not Working on iPhone Shuffle [Wired: Gadget Lab]
5 Comments
Leave a comment
RECENT COMMENTS
Clay on iPhone Nano probability zero ....
"#1, I think you're missing the point. You make the screen smaller, you make you..."
Andor on iPhone Nano probability zero ....
"iPhone Shuffle!!! Wouldn-t be marvelous have an iPhone that calls randomly to a..."
Anonymous on iPhone Nano probability zero ....
"What would an iPhone Shuffle do when you wanted to call someone--dial a random p..."
jeffgreco on iPhone Nano probability zero ....
"I don't see Apple cutting off that delicious stream of revenue that is the App S..."
OM on iPhone Nano probability zero ....
""The hardware specifications of a slightly-smaller iPhone would either break ..."
AT |
|
- New images of the lunar surface
- World's oldest basketball shoes
- Summer Reading List by Roy Christopher
- The Choppers (1961)
- @BBVBOX: recent guest-tweeted web video picks (boingboingvideo.com)
- Ript: the dude equivalent of a padded bra
- NAACP comic from early 1960s
- Awesome pixel-art in cross-stitch form
- Video of Walt Disney World's Obamabot
- Anti-paparazzi handbag
OM
#1 – 5:34 PM December 15, 2008
"The hardware specifications of a slightly-smaller iPhone would either break existing apps, change the existing user interface, or make it a pain in the ass"
...Only if the iPhone Nano's screen does not maintain the same aspect ratio as the regular one. Hence 640x480 scaling up to 800x600, 1024x768 and 1280x1024 and vice versa provided the app scales properly. A simple OS tweak regarding the video driver should solve that problem.
jeffgreco
#2 – 8:42 PM December 15, 2008
I don't see Apple cutting off that delicious stream of revenue that is the App Store, they'll figure SOMETHING out.
Anonymous Anonymous
#3 – 9:37 PM December 15, 2008
What would an iPhone Shuffle do when you wanted to call someone--dial a random phone number? Pick someone at random from your contact list?
Andor
#4 – 2:12 AM December 16, 2008
iPhone Shuffle!!!
Wouldn-t be marvelous have an iPhone that calls randomly to any number of your contacts?
Clay
#5 – 9:29 AM December 16, 2008
#1, I think you're missing the point.
You make the screen smaller, you make your interactions with the device significantly different. Unless your hand is getting 33% smaller too, trying to do the very same things on a smaller screen with your same, big old hand is likely to be very, very frustrating.
The huge amount of R&D that went into designing the iPhone UI predicates a 3.5" 320x480 screen. Changing those foundations requires changing a lot of other things.