Soviet-era springwound nuclear submarine clocks = CCCP chic

6a00d83452989a69e20105371ab4f0970b-800wi.jpg

For chic living room stylings straight out of the iron belly of the CCCP’s submariner nuclear arsenal, consider a Vostok 8-Day Springwound Clock, ripped right from the countdown panel of a Soviet nuclear sub. There’s quite a few available on eBay.

Soviet Nuclear Subs Deploy 8 Day Springwound Clock [Retrothing]

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to Soviet-era springwound nuclear submarine clocks = CCCP chic

  1. mralistair says:

    Am I alone if marveling at they idea that you’d power a submarine with a nuclear reactor but still have a clockwork clock…

    what if you forget to wind it up?

  2. strider_mt2k says:

    Soviet technology and the attitudes that drove it and them are nothing less than fascinating.

    (One of) The reason(s) they put a windup clock on a Nuclear sub is the same reason they put vacuum tubes in the early nuclear-era fighter jets.

    Both were simpler, easier to make robust, and most importantly both could be easily used and maintained in a post-nuclear world with vastly reduced technology and manufacturing capability.

    -there’s so much more too.

  3. Anonymous says:

    You might want to pass a scintillometer over those clocks to see how hot they are.

  4. Anonymous says:

    Vostok also makes some decent very affordable wrist watches. A Vostok Amphibian can be had for under $50, and is self-winding, has a 31 jewel movement, and is 200 meter water-resistant. Retro-cool looks too. About the only downsides are they don’t do quick date adjustment, and their lume is pretty useless.

    Check out the Russian Watch Guide web site:
    http://www.russianwatchguide.com/

  5. illobo says:

    (obligatory quote)

    in soviet russia, springwound nuclear submarine clocks winds you !

  6. Vveneziani says:

    My father bought one of these about ten years ago, again, ripped right from a Russian sub. Always liked the look of it and boy does it stay on time. Provided you keep winding it of course.

  7. RedShirt77 says:

    “My father bought one…”

    Did you check it for a nuclear signature?

  8. Moriarty says:

    @ #2: “Simple and robust” is right. I have some experience working on vintage military aircraft, and boy are the different design philosophies evident. American aircraft were always more technologically sophisticated and usually had better performance in most respects, but they rely on extensive and highly trained ground crews. Soviet aircraft were designed to be able to be maintained by a recently drafted farmer with literally not much more than a big wrench, and they’re rugged as hell.

  9. Trent Hawkins says:

    someone should run a Geiger counter over that, just to be on the safe side.

  10. urshrew says:

    Ya hachoo.

  11. el_beardo says:

    i bought a clock from (i want to say) TARGET about 10 years ago that’s nearly IDENTICAL to this. the face and shape, anyhow… the clock reads “Kauchgupckue” just like the Russian ones. it doesn’t have a wind-up action and it doesn’t open (without a screwdriver) and the back reads “Made is Taiwan” and it wasn’t $400 (i think it was around $15 – $20) – HA! – it hangs in my bathroom above the toilet!

    here’s a JPG — http://www.flickr.com/photos/fieldofgravity/3266529177/

  12. dculberson says:

    So apparently we need to define “identical.”

  13. el_beardo says:

    i did say NEARLY identical in shape and the clock face. i never said it was totally identical. so, apparently we need to define “shut-up.” – hahaha

  14. microcars says:

    I wonder how many of these are repros?

    for $499 a pop? sounds like a market for repros to me.

  15. dculberson says:

    Just being snarky; but my point was it’s only as “nearly identical” as a Rolex knock-off is to the real thing.

  16. el_beardo says:

    yeah, i know. i was just kidding anyhow. it does have a very similar face and shape is all i was trying to convey. and i also meant it was similar in aesthetic and not functionality. it sure looks a lot like the original, surprisingly. and it’s totally not fooling anyone. not too bad for a clock purchased at Target about 10 years ago. i didn’t know Target was RED.

  17. dbarak says:

    I’ve got one of those that I bought close to 20 years ago. When I was in the Navy, my job was to track Soviet subs from Vikings, so I knew I had to have one when I saw them for sale.

    Wind-up clocks aren’t necessarily considered old technology. The US Navy still keeps three wind-up chronometers on each ship for celestial navigation purposes. They’re highly accurate when properly maintained. Of course GPS is providing much better data overall, but the chronometers can’t be beat as a backup.

  18. Halloween Jack says:

    I used to see this sort of thing a lot in the mid-nineties. Doing a quick search, it’s good to see that you can still get a greatcoat, even if they are sold out at the moment.

  19. dumbwhore says:

    Not to be a buzzkill, but most of these are straight from existing stock or from a production line and not ripped out of subs.

  20. Anonymous says:

    Just so you know, American subs were using hand wound clocks as late as 1979 when I finished my career in boats. Don’t know why the Russians did it but I suspect the Americans did it for the same reason everything else in the Navy was antiquated: 200+ plus years of tradition unblemished by progress.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

More BB

Boing Boing Video

Flickr Pool

Digg

Wikipedia

Advertise

Displays ads via FM Tech

RSS and Email

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution. Boing Boing is a trademark of Happy Mutants LLC in the United States and other countries.

FM Tech