Vaio P benchmarked: solid-state version much faster

sony-vaio-p.jpg

Some netbook makers use cheap flash for their “SSD” editions, turning them into pure marketing machines with lower read-write speeds than larger hard drive equivalents. This is not the case with Sony’s Vaio P, whose solid-state drives leave spinning disks in the dust.

You might want to hold off on that $300 upgrade, however, as some users report little difference in perceived performance in the real world.

Far more pressing, users report, is the lack of working drivers for the Intel GMA500 video chipset in the P: an almost incomprehensible failure resting somewhere between Intel and Sony. [Pocketables]

About Rob Beschizza

Follow me on Twitter.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Vaio P benchmarked: solid-state version much faster

  1. Anonymous says:

    Fast SSDs are available for those other netbooks you’re mocking, and for far less than $300. Go to eBay and do a quick search…

    Yes, it’s worth it. I got one for my Eee PC and it’s like having a whole new machine.

  2. zuzu says:

    Re: GMA500

    Looking forward to that Fedora Linux on Vaio P article. :)

  3. Rob Beschizza says:

    I totally forgot about that! ON IT.

  4. snow scorpion says:

    I thought “flash drive” and “solid state drive” were different terms for the same thing.

    The post makes it sound like they are similar but not the same.

    So, are the similar but different or are they the same thing?

  5. GeekMan says:

    But does it run OS X?

  6. A. says:

    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these!

    Oh, wait… not /.

  7. Rob Beschizza says:

    There is not much likelihood of worthwhile OSX on the vaio P, not least because of that video chipset.

  8. Nur says:

    #4:

    Pretty much, it’s the same underlying technology but the solid state drives you see demanding eyewatering prices have been heavily optimised for use as a system drive, they’re faster, they’re built to last longer, wear levelling, caching, power saving etc.

    I’m having trouble thinking of an analogy, but basically the flash drive came out and that was designed for cost and most people are ok with them as long as they don’t break too much and are reasonably fast if they’re cheap whereas SSDS are built to a higher standard and cost more because of that. You’re right to smell some marketing-speak though.

  9. Rob Beschizza says:

    Standard flash is to “SSD” as a Ford Taurus is to a modern Jaguar. The latter is obviously faster and better, but yet unnervingly similar.

  10. GeekMan says:

    Rob: Drat. How about the “Vaino” then? :D

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 

More BB

Boing Boing Video

Flickr Pool

Digg

Wikipedia

Advertise

Displays ads via FM Tech

RSS and Email

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution. Boing Boing is a trademark of Happy Mutants LLC in the United States and other countries.

FM Tech