Review: going on beer runs w/the GoWear Fit

Running is for criminals. I've always detested it. It's not that I can't take exercise or sweating (I love biking, hiking). I loathe the constant exertion of jogging, the pounding of the feet, and the nagging suspicion I'm always doing it wrong. In college, I split my time between the beach and treadmills, and preferred the latter, even though running inside hurts my soul. In retrospect, I assumed forcing a machine to do the pacing was the appeal. Lazy dude, unforgiving machine. Turns out I was wrong. It wasn't until I strapped on the GoWear Fit -- an arm/wristband system that tabulates distance (in steps) and calories burned over time -- that it all clicked. It's not the treadmill's pacing I was after. It's the feedback. The data. All that time I was running blind. No wonder I hated it. After the jump, hear how I learned to stop worrying and sort of, actually, kind of, almost love the run. As much as I hate running, I love dieting. A lot. A year into my first desk job, my midsection ballooned thanks to the three b's: burritos, beer and the Bell (specifically the fourth meal). My girlfriend at the time (now wife) diplomatically suggested a diet: calorie counting. It worked. Quite well. Dropping 20 lbs. in a couple months emphasized just how dead-simple the science of hacking your body really is. A quick primer for metabon00bs: Your body burns a specific number of calories every day, on its own, no exercise necessary (my BRM or basal metabolic rate is 2400 cal). Every piece of food and drink that goes in has a calorie count. An average banana is 110. So is a Bud Light (it's less filling; don't start). If everything you consume adds up to your BMR, you'll maintain your current weight. Consume less than your daily burn, you'll shed pounds faster than a bachelor party at a London gentleman's pub. Cutting roughly 500 calories below your BMR can help you drop one pound a week. Add in exercise: you can either lose weight quicker or do what I'm super into: continue losing/maintaining weight at the same rate, but add back in whatever food/beverage(s) total up to the burned amount. Again, simple addition, self-control and a basic regimen. Over a week or so, I ran four times (not much, but that's 400% more than what I did in 2007-2008). Day 1: Control Lisa and I reluctantly jogged 3.5 miles (Google Mapped before) in Golden Gate Park without any added technology or knowledge about our pace, heart rates, calories, etc. I felt sore and stiff. It sucked, mostly (and I had a gnarly sneeze fit after). I looked online afterwards and tried to estimate how much time we spent over the distance, and therefore the calories I burned. Guesstimating really hinders the ability to have a guilt-free beer. Day 1 Results:
  • duration = ~50 minutes?
  • calories burned = ~300?
  • "free" beer allowed = 0 oz.
  • gowear close up.jpg
    [image via Vitonica] Day 2: It knows who I am? Same location, same run. Cold morning. Sync watch to armband after registering online (height, weight, age). "Welcome Steven," the watch greets me. I begin fiddling with the buttons as we run. Then tightening the armband strap, loosening it, and back. Checking calories, obsessively at first. After settling into a decent stride, the first alert comes: "moderate level achieved." Alright!!! ...Wait, what does that mean? The GoWear Fit is not a heart rate monitor, so you can't expect marathoner data: no target or max heart rates. And you won't get speed over time either (just calories burned). The device is intended to be worn all day long, so you get a more accurate count of what you're burning -- and not just while exercising, but walking to the bus, grocery shopping, and even at rest, typing... not a major source of caloric burn, btw). Using an accelerometer and thermometer in the armband, the system purports to measure the following: motion and steps, plus temp, heat flux and galvanic skin response (GSR) or electrodermal response. The armband has a plastic case you pop the unit into. On the back are two medal pads (the GSR sensor). All of these measurements are crunched by two basic algorithms ("running" and "resting"), which account for your stated age, weight, height, gender. What this means: you can't just sit in a sauna and expect it to tell you you've lost the same calories you would while running. It's not exclusively body heat or steps taken, but a combination of heat, exertion, the vigor with which the accelerometer shakes, and a biological profile (so don't lie about your specs). The system uses the data to classify the intensity of your fitness into "vigorous" and "moderate" (also based onthe desired caloric burn you've specified). I thought I'd find these alerts distracting and confusing, even annoying. Quite the contrary: while my racing heart's saying "This sucks. Time for beer?", the watches reminds me I'm doing good, and I should keep it up. With the push of a button, you can see how many calories you've burned thus far at "moderate" and "vigorous" (roughly 200, 350 for me). After just a day of use the GoWear Fit proved easy and comfortable to use, though I didn't track or care too much about my daily totals. All the data from the armband is uploaded via USB or wirelessly to, where its stored for your perusal or dissection. If you need, you can export to PDF or a neatly-tabulated XLS a basic summary of your performance for any specific week or number of weeks (up to 28 days). I tried this out, but didn't have much use for it. Remember, all I want is to know after each run, how many beers I can drink without concern for my weight. Day 2 Results:
  • duration: 48 minutes*
  • calories burned: 448!
  • free beer allowed: 48 oz. of Bud Light
  • Day 3: Trail running = the devil Hills. Panting. Stopping. Ugh. Worthy of a six-pack? Day 3 Results:
  • duration: 22 minutes*
  • calories burned: 206 (wtf?)
  • free beer allowed: 22 oz. of Bud Light
  • gowear sun.jpg
    Day 4: Miracle miles, five of them Crisp, bright Sunday run along the path by the Golden Gate Bridge. I decide to add a heart rate monitor into the mix, just for kicks. There are tons of other runners of all shapes and sizes, including the type who wear spandex and look smug as they coast by. Still, I think I'm starting to get it. No regrets or embarrassment about the lightweight, polarized running sunglasses I'm wearing (they are great for keeping dust from disturbing your contacts). Armband is adjusted properly. Feet feel light. The heart rate begins to distract me, though. I find myself speeding up to get it higher, not really knowing what it means. I spend about 1/4th of the 5-mile run (above) looking at the fluctuations: 170, 165, 160 (hurry up), 163, 168 (mmmmk), 172. Exhausting for a total heart rate amateur. I know my "max heart rate" should be about 197, but my friend Mat says a better estimate is too run 0.5 miles as fast as you can until, "You think you're about to throw up. Not feel like it, but close to actually throwing up." No thanks! We finish a run that's 1.5 miles longer than the first one. My legs feel good. I'm not breathing as heavy as I thought I'd be. But I realize I'm going to leave the marathons to Lisa. As long as I can drink more beer, and not get a gut, that's fine by me. Day 4 Results:
  • duration: 52 minutes*
  • calories burned: 530
  • free beer allowed: 57oz. of Bud Light
  • *not counting cool down, warm up Finish Line The armband, watch and 12 month account costs $250 (plus $6/month). Pricey. Honestly, if I were on a budget and interested in calories (not heart rate), I'd consider a Nike Plus. Of course, there are some downsides to spending less: the Nike Plus reading is less scientific (i.e. no GSR or temp/heat flux). Regardless of what that means in terms of the data (I plan to do a comparison), psychologically, I enjoyed knowing that my biology was playing a part. Additionally, you can't wear the Nike Plus with all of your shoes (unless you buy the $8 Shoe Wallet), and even then, you have to attach and detach it to different shoes (a hassle if you plan to track calories all day, as you can with the GoWear). While running, too, I believe it's easier to look at a watch and press a few buttons for instant feedback than it is either to a) carry an iPod/nano in your hand, or b) position your arm to read the nano screen strapped to your bicep. All of these points could easily be moot in the next year. The amount of tools we're building and tweaking to take biological measurements of all kind is thrilling. The key with all of it is really to establish your end goal, understand the level of engagement you want/need, and find whichever pieces of tech fit that. In time, re-evaluate, upgrade, downgrade, etc. I barely got a taste of heart rate. I didn't even scrape the surface of GPS. But I'm more engaged with my body, and the chance I'll keeping this up seems good. Eventually, too, I may even be able to upgrade to a decent beer, though I'll always steer clear of Sierra Nevada Bigfoot.
    This entry was posted in Theme Post. Bookmark the permalink.

    12 Responses to Review: going on beer runs w/the GoWear Fit

    1. tuckels says:

      I wanna know where you got your goggles and do they really make everything look so psychedelic?

    2. Anonymous says:

      Generally you burn 100 calories per mile you run

    3. Gary says:

      You know, you could measure this in good beer instead of Bud. Then it would be really inspiring.

      Or, instead, switch to cycling. I did a 5000 calorie ride a few days ago. Awesome. And, man, when you guys go to the bar afterward you are seeing dead relatives after the first beer.

    4. aj says:

      Bud Light?! Not even Stella or Amstel?

    5. aj says:

      I do like the idea however of running as anti-beer.

    6. greenzinfandel says:

      My hesitation: I hate running/walking/jogging/etc with sh*t on my arms, even if it’s telling me vital info. I don’t even wear a wristwatch. My wife gave me a pedometer to use throughout the day and I ditched it due to the incessant clicking. But as I have my weaknesses as well (barleywine in particular) I gots to keep pumping.

      That having been said, at least you were jogging in a gorgeous environment. I was walking the dog up by Golden Gate Park last weekend, in fact, to say hi to the Bison and check out the “dream house” (couldn’t find it).

      Follow up q: isn’t there an ipod touch/iphone app that does this?

    7. James E. says:

      I’ve been doing this kind of thing with my runs for a long time. I use a Suunto T3 with a FootPod and track distance over time, average mph, average and high heart rate, and calories burned. Makes running more interesting, for me at least. Not the type of thing you wear all day long, but cheaper in the end.

    8. briandickens says:

      I have been using a Garmin Forerunner 305 for about a week now and I love it. It gathers data that I can then use to plot my run on a map, colored by what my heart rate was at the time. Or colored by my speed or pace. It’s fantastic. I imagine that when it is time for me to train for a marathon, that information will come in very handy. For now, it’s just my way to see how I’m doing in relation to previous runs. Fantastic!

      (btw, SportTracks is awesome software for the forerunner and may work with the Suunto.)

    9. Steven Leckart says:

      @James E., yeah the heart rate monitor I tried was a Suunto. Easy to use, good interface. I didn’t get to play with the software, which I’m told is atrocious.

    10. James E. says:

      @Steven Leckart Yeah, software does stink. I track it myself using a Google Spreadsheet. Not as fancy, but I get the data I want.

    11. damo says:

      Being able to continue drinking beer and eating whatever I want were among my major motivations for starting regular running a few years ago.

      Nothing beats the amount of food that you can eat when you’re training for a marathon.

      When a guy hits 30 I’ve always said that there are 3 options:
      1. Get Fat
      2. Stop drinking beer
      3. Start Running (or whatever)

    12. Anonymous says:

      If you want to run and drink beer then you should check out your local Hash House Harriers. They are a world wide drinking club with a running problem.


    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


    More BB

    Boing Boing Video

    Flickr Pool




    Displays ads via FM Tech

    RSS and Email

    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution. Boing Boing is a trademark of Happy Mutants LLC in the United States and other countries.

    FM Tech