By Rob Beschizza at 4:10 am Mon, Jun 29, 2009
Actually, it’s incomplete and full of erroneous data… It’s a poor comparison, not suitable for anyone, least of all anyone who needs it.
That comparison is rough. First, they make all the phones look the same size when actually the Pre is smaller than the others. The G1 does have video recording. It should also state that the memory for the Storm and G1 are expandable.
But the information on it is crap. At least the end value. If someone is really paying $150/mo to use the iphone, they are dumb.
Not really a fair comparison. The Android specs look like a generation behind the rest, rather than Cupcake/Hero/Samsung Galaxy-level.
Wired should’ve waited just a bit (hopefully not too long) until these new Android phones were widely available, otherwise why even include it?
Faulty pricing, images not to scale, not latest models. Why the back of the iPhone and the front of the others?
Mail (will not be published) (required)
Submit a tip
The rules you agree to by using this website.
Who will be eaten first?
Jason Weisberger, Publisher
Ken Snider, Sysadmin